deilenberger wrote:
The low seat actually is probably the best of the standard seats. The shape is different from the taller seats, and after around 2,000 miles or so - it breaks into your butt and isn't awful. Not super wonderful, but certainly tolerable. I had my low seat redone by Sargent, and that makes it even a bit better (and it looks MUCH better..)
I assume you're balls of the foot with moto boots on? There are boots with thicker soles which will help get more of your foot down. If you can do both feet balls on the ground you should be fine, you can always lean the bike a bit to get either foot down flat when needed.
Thanks Don for all the insight... good to know about redoing the low seat is a possibility.. I was actually test riding with some hiking boots on ..

So, I probably need to try it with some thicker soles. I think with the standard seat (I did try riding it that way) the seat was not just too high, but also way to wide for me.. obviously that made my legs "shorter" ..but it was also extremely uncomfortable for me.
Las wrote:
Have you checked the rear suspension preload setting on the bike (under the seat). My inseam is exactly 30" and I have the stock standard comfort seat and suspension on my 2012 r12r Classic. I can just about flatfoot both feet. A stock standard suspension with the preload at standard (halfway between hard and soft) is factory tuned for a single rider weighing 187 lbs, no pillion, no heavy luggage. I weigh 187 lbs
I did check the suspension preload and it was already the 'softest' it could be.. but I think I know what the difference is between my 30" and yours.. I am about 60lbs lighter.. which brings up is an excellent point I hadn't thought about.. I have only test driven the r1200r bikes without any luggage on them... since the low seat already gets the balls of my feet down a little more weight might make it perfect for me! And I am planning on getting the saddle bags and on occasions use trunk luggage.
Ol' Jeffers wrote:
Rather than lower the suspension your first consideration IMHO should be a low seat.
BMW can supply three seat heights for the R1200R.
Thank's Ol' Jeffers ... that's exactly why I put this question up here.. I would rather not have to mess with the suspension... but when I test rode a few r1200r bikes that had a low seat I still felt like I didn't have enough grip on the ground with my feet. I am mostly concerned about needing to move the bike around while sitting on it, e.g. backing in or out of a parking spot, or having to back up at a stop light for some reasons ...like this jerk turning left while I am at a stop light and completely cutting into my lane while I am standing at a red light a few weeks ago.. I luckily realized quickly enough what an idiot he was and having a very low bike right now I was able to back up quickly enough to just barely get out of the way.. there was literally less than an inch between his car and me when he got in front of me...was glad then that I could back up my bike..
Ol' Jeffers wrote:
It pees me right off when manufacturers seem to cater for riders who are 6ft.13 tall!
ALL of the KTMs are way too tall for li'l ol' me!!
I agree!!!! I was originally thinking about a KTM...but I need a ladder to climb on and off of that thing! And I am from Austria and can attest that Austrians are not THAT tall!!
I think I will stick to looking for a standard suspension with a low seat.. get the seat redone like Don if needed and if I still don't like it I can always safe up some more money (BMW is out to bankrupt me!

) and get a different suspension...