R12R Tire pressure - owners manual vs dealer recommendation

Topics related to the ownership, maintenance, equipping, operation, and riding of the R1200R.

Moderator: Moderators

BackNBlack
Basic User
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:54 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Roseville, CA

R12R Tire pressure - owners manual vs dealer recommendation

Post by BackNBlack »

Perhaps those of you with more R12R miles can assist. What is best tire pressure for solo, no gear loaded on the R12R? I ask because owners manual says 32 Front and 36 Rear, whereas BMW Sales guy suggested 40 front and 42 rear - I believe he was recommending this for optimal tire wear. I'm interested in that, but more interested in quality of the ride - good grip, smooth ride, safety, etc. Appreciate any of your recommendations based on your experience.

Thanks!

BNB
R1200R!
User avatar
celticus
Lifer
Posts: 2169
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:03 pm
Donating Member #: 548
Location: East Tn.

Post by celticus »

Perhaps I am negligent but I keep mine at the same pressure solo or two up. Heavy load or just my big butt. Around 40 rear and 37 or so front.

Mark
User avatar
ka5ysy
Triple Lifer
Posts: 1070
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:05 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Prairieville Louisiana

Post by ka5ysy »

If you look at the tire data, the reason for specific inflation pressures is to give optimal contact patch size based on load etc. Over inflation makes for a smaller contact patch and somewhat less traction. Under inflation causes a larger patch at the cost of sidewall flex that generates heat in the sidewall and tire failure possibilities. Soft tires also may cause handling problems . It is better to be slightly overinflated than to be under inflated.

the motorcycle operating manual recommendation is probably the best information generally, and the tire manufacturers all have consumer lines that can give specifics for a particular tire. They are the best source of that kind of information.

It probably does not hurt to stay at the "loaded" pressure all the time. I tend to use that on my Road Attacks because The Boss hops on and rides with me a lot. Only problem I have noticed is that the rear tire is developing a noticeable flat spot in the center after 4000 miles which is a sign of overinflation as a rule, but I do a lot of fast highway miles. Still lots of tread life showing though.
MSF #127350 NAUI #36288
2011 RT
WARNING: TEST RIDING THE R1200R IS HAZARDOUS TO YOUR FINANCES
User avatar
mcavotta
Basic User
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 6:27 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:

Post by mcavotta »

ka5ysy wrote:Only problem I have noticed is that the rear tire is developing a noticeable flat spot in the center after 4000 miles which is a sign of overinflation as a rule, but I do a lot of fast highway miles. Still lots of tread life showing though.
Overinflation? Seems counterintuitive, but I'm open to explanation.

I've been wondering what pressure to run as well. Should I be checking with the tires cold or warm?

Thanks!
—m
BackNBlack
Basic User
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:54 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Roseville, CA

Post by BackNBlack »

I always check tire pressure cold right before I go out for ride (I ride once or twice a week) as cold check is the normal owners manual recommendation. On past bikes I have always run my tires at the owners manual recommended cold pressure give or take a pound. I may have to check back with the sales guy again on why he recommended higher.
R1200R!
User avatar
iowabeakster
Quadruple Lifer
Posts: 1962
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 5:43 am
Location: iowa city, ia

Post by iowabeakster »

My dealer (and conventional wisdon) says to go with the higher pressure. Longer tire life, better milage, better handling are the reasons.

BMW recommends the lower pressure to give comfy test rides, hopefully to sell more bikes.
I was dreaming when I wrote this, forgive me if it goes astray...
deilenberger
Honorary Lifer
Posts: 4210
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: New Jersey USA
Contact:

Post by deilenberger »

iowabeakster wrote:My dealer (and conventional wisdon) says to go with the higher pressure. Longer tire life, better milage, better handling are the reasons.

BMW recommends the lower pressure to give comfy test rides, hopefully to sell more bikes.
IMHO - your dealer is fulla'beans (tech-term..)

The manufacturers of the tires likely know a bit more than your dealer, and that's where BMW comes up with the pressure recommendations. It has to do not only with wear/handling but also load-rating.

As far as comfy test rides - well - I ride looking for performance/handling.

Comfort on a test ride is pretty much restricted to how I fit the bike. I haven't noticed a real comfort difference running pressures from about 5 under factory recommendation (inaccurate gauge) to 15PSI over the high-pressure recommendation (dealer set them there..) Not enough difference to be startling... although the 15 over felt perhaps a tad harsh over sharp bumps - it wasn't uncomfortable, just noticeable.

What I did notice is 5PISI under the front tire started to pill up the rubber, and handling was sub-par. It stopped doing that at the correct factory pressure.

I do run a few PSI (5 usually) higher than the single person cold pressure because I've found I have less cupping of the front tire that way (I'm a heavy user of brakes), but that also means I probably have a smaller contact patch and less grip.
Don Eilenberger - NJ Shore
2012 R1200R - I love this bike!
User avatar
mogu83
Lifer
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:40 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Harry Costello Jersey Shore, NJ

Post by mogu83 »

A lot of words but no information.

I think what BlackNBlack was looking for was something like this:

Hi, my name is Harry and I run F38 and R40, because that's what I like.

Anyone else know what their tire pressure is? :lol: :lol:
Harry Costello -- Jersey Shore
2007 R1200R
1974 + 75 CB125S
1971 R75
2020 Guzzi V85TT
BMWMOA 57358
User avatar
celticus
Lifer
Posts: 2169
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:03 pm
Donating Member #: 548
Location: East Tn.

Post by celticus »

I said earlier"Around 40 rear and 37 or so front" but I have been known to ride with them 42 rear and 40 front. What about shock set up? Should that be another subject all together, as it is another subject altogether?
Mark
User avatar
mogu83
Lifer
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:40 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Harry Costello Jersey Shore, NJ

Post by mogu83 »

celticus wrote:What about shock set up? Should that be another subject all together, as it is another subject altogether?
Mark

Good question and I agree with your answer :lol:

I thought it would be interesting to know what others were running in their tires. Like the numbers.
I've been around long enough to hear all the theories and read all the articles.
Mark - It seems only the two of us know how much air is in our tires (tyres for DJ)
Harry Costello -- Jersey Shore
2007 R1200R
1974 + 75 CB125S
1971 R75
2020 Guzzi V85TT
BMWMOA 57358
User avatar
qgaex
Lifer
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 2:05 pm
Donating Member #: 647
Location: Black Forest

Post by qgaex »

2.5 F / 2.9 R

Cheers

qgaex
*whoismetric*
User avatar
celticus
Lifer
Posts: 2169
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:03 pm
Donating Member #: 548
Location: East Tn.

Post by celticus »

I'll be checking my tires soon for a trip this Friday down to the north Georgia mountians in Suches where we will attened the Festival Of Fives Rally at the TWO campground. Wonderful roads all around. All of the roads are great. The campground is terrific. See the latest Where and When in the MOA for details. Join us.
Mark
User avatar
mogu83
Lifer
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 6:40 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Harry Costello Jersey Shore, NJ

Post by mogu83 »

Mark,
Your not going to ride that Hexhead to a /5 event are you. The anti- technology types might burn your bike.
I remember when the /5 came out , it was marketed as the NEW BMW, lighter,improved engine,real horsepower,modern style and better electronics. It took a few years to get off my BSA and save enough for a Beemer. And here we are 35 years later with the same thing. I wonder what will be the latest and greatest in another 35 years (although it will be irrelevant to me).

Here's a pic of my /5 (yes - still have it) at Antietam Battlefield taken this spring. 600 miles on a 36 year old bike and it didn't miss a beat.
I hope the NEW BMW serves me as well but I don't think I'll be riding it for 35 years.

Image
Harry Costello -- Jersey Shore
2007 R1200R
1974 + 75 CB125S
1971 R75
2020 Guzzi V85TT
BMWMOA 57358
User avatar
celticus
Lifer
Posts: 2169
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:03 pm
Donating Member #: 548
Location: East Tn.

Post by celticus »

The bunch I hang with are generally too lazy to get up and burn something. A motorcycle anyway.
There are still one or two of them who can beat me on the twisties with their airheads so they don't get too mean.
There will be all kinds of bikes down at Suches this weekend.
Mark
User avatar
celticus
Lifer
Posts: 2169
Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:03 pm
Donating Member #: 548
Location: East Tn.

Post by celticus »

In preperation for tomorrows trip I checked mine, 42 front 38 rear and I'm leaving it that way.
Mark
Aitch
Basic User
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 6:34 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: NW Arkansas

What's right?

Post by Aitch »

My little Service and Technical Booklet says:

One-up front 14.5 psi Rear 36.3

My BMW Motorrad Repair Manual says:

One-up front 31.9 psi Rear 36.3

Anyone else notice this discrepancy?
02 R1150 R Black
69 GMC Stroker
84 300ZX
74 CL450 Scrambler

Which way where and if any when?
deilenberger
Honorary Lifer
Posts: 4210
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: New Jersey USA
Contact:

Re: What's right?

Post by deilenberger »

Aitch wrote:My little Service and Technical Booklet says:

One-up front 14.5 psi Rear 36.3

My BMW Motorrad Repair Manual says:

One-up front 31.9 psi Rear 36.3

Anyone else notice this discrepancy?
Mine doesn't say that.. I rounded them up after looking in the manual, and I used 32/37PSI.

What page do you see that on?
Don Eilenberger - NJ Shore
2012 R1200R - I love this bike!
deilenberger
Honorary Lifer
Posts: 4210
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: New Jersey USA
Contact:

On the same topic - Conti tire wear..

Post by deilenberger »

Anyone know the rear Conti RoadAttack tread depth?

Measured mine tonight. It appears to be between 4.5-5mm. I'm just curious since I have very close to 5,000 miles on the tires, and someone I talked to over the weekend only gets 6,000 out of a set (Triump Speed-Triple.)
Don Eilenberger - NJ Shore
2012 R1200R - I love this bike!
Aitch
Basic User
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 6:34 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: NW Arkansas

Post by Aitch »

The tire pressure listing is in Sect 3 page 71 of my Tech. Booklet
BMW Motorrad Order no. 01 47 7 664 947 10.00 2nd edition USA/RF

Image
02 R1150 R Black
69 GMC Stroker
84 300ZX
74 CL450 Scrambler

Which way where and if any when?
AllanCook
Lifer
Posts: 388
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:11 am
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Austin, Texas

Post by AllanCook »

That's weird. My data is on p. 60, and it doesn't look anything like that. It also says 2.2 bar = 31.9 PSI. I think 14.5 must be a typo.

Also, the photo shows a 170 rear tire. Mine's a 180/55 ZR17.

According to my book, the recommended pressure is 31.9 front, 36.3 rear for a single rider with cold tires.

I have the Contis. Do you think there's a different book depending on the tires? Mine was one of the very first imported into the U.S. Maybe that makes a difference?
Allan
Austin
Post Reply