Page 1 of 2

Is this treachery ......?

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:19 pm
by John I. Stephen
I mean, it must have happened to some of you. I mean, there you are feeling quite content about life with an R1150R and then it happens; quite out of the blue ... and you just know it'll change things .... permanently ....

Taking your bike to be serviced does have its downside... especially when the dealer hands you the keys to a brand new black K1200S. I mean, you know in your head that the R1150R is a great bike; it has sensible meaty power; good handling and does what a decent bike should do. But then in your heart, things are different ....within a few miles of riding the K1200S (at the same speeds as I normally ride my R (pretty well within the speed limits)) I had a huge grin. The bike rides like a dream; its handling is the best I have experienced and the engine is a joy. It has power beyond belief and yet it will quietly pootle at 30-40mph in top without a problem and pull cleanly and powerfully. Drop a cog or two, get the revs up to around 5000rpm or more and she starts to howl, quietly at first and then wail above 7000rpm. As for acceleration, I have merely tasted it; but it is awesome; quite out of this world.

So, is this treachery to feel this way about another bike when your R1150R is in for a service; is this like two timing? How will I feel about the R when I pick her up again in a few days time .... what can I do ??!! :?

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:46 pm
by yjleesvrr
I test rode a K1200S while I was having my Roadster serviced for the 36k mile mark. When I found myself doing 96 mph down a 55mph road, saw a cop coming the other way and slowed down to 70, and then hit the throttle to get myself out of that zip code lest I get a ticket (and thereby did at least 100), I realized that the K120S would probably land me in jail if I bought one.

I took my Roadster back thankful that it would keep me more level headed.

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:55 pm
by RForestR
yjleesvrr wrote: I realized that the K120S would probably land me in jail if I bought one.
Haven't riddent the K-bike yet, but that would definitely be my concern too from everything I've heard.
Heck, I got stopped for 108 in an 80 (that's kms per hour!) on my R the week I picked it up :D
Can't imagine what would happen the first week I owned the K-bike!

I just don't think that anything out there is as versatile as my R for the type of riding I do. It'll do long trips, runs to the store or work, and anything else you ask from it. Not sure if the K will do that or not. I'll agree, sure is pretty, but not ready to give up my R yet (or Ever!!), I simply love the darn thing too much, no matter what else crosses my path.

Cheers,
Chris

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:05 pm
by DK
John,

A couple years ago I rode the K1200S and, like you, was amazed at the power and handling of it. It was like an unlimited power curve :!: After I got off it, I just told myself it would get me in trouble because I'd always be running it too fast. Without a doubt, it is a nice bike.

DK

How Fast?

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:10 pm
by dragonmojo
Most of my favorite roads are 60mph roads, tops. Any faster and you won't be on the road anymore. I don't care how much lung capacity you have, there's only so much gas you can siphon out through a drinking straw.

I hear those Honda flat-sixes are silky smooth rides too.

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:59 am
by hirsty
Can't be helped I'm afraid John - there is a reason that dealers park the tastiest stuff out the front & let you ride it ...

I'm completely torn between the R1200R (with a Wudo fairing), the awesome R1200S and haven't yet ridden a K1200S - that one really is out of my price range, but they're getting closer to £8K all the time: here is the first all-black one I saw recently at CW Motorcycles, Dorchester.

Image

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:15 pm
by sjbmw
My dealer discontinued their service loaner program.
No more fun on other bikes. I found this highly disconcerting.

They had a cool K bike form the early 90's...I think it was a 3 cyl 750?
I got to borrow that before it was a cool ride.

But I am wondering if I was told the entire truth....

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:21 pm
by John I. Stephen
Sorry guys I'm going to be controversial again :lol:

I hear so many of you talking about the awesome performance and the fact that the K1200S is SO FAST that you found yourself doing 130 when you thought you were doing 80 ...... I say "rubbish" to that ! I have just had a lovely detour home on the K1200S and I never once blew the speed limits by and unreasonable margin. This bike is 100% controllable. Yes it may be tempting to "bring it on" but she is just as happy staying in 6th from 40 mph and cruising along. The huge torque of the motor makes the experience very pleasurable. And when you do want to overtake, it's a much more relaxed affair than on the R1150R; almost "think" overtake, and she'd done it, no fuss no huge acceleration, just a quiet smooth "wooosh" (not exactly onomatopoeia but almost !).

But then, when it's safe, wind it on to 7000rpm+ in the lower gears and feel the adrenalin rush !

Yes, I am truly smitten :!:

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:39 pm
by sjbmw
Nothing controversial about it.

You are talking about a 130+ hp 4 cylinder, vs. a 85+ hp 2 cylinder.

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:46 pm
by thal13
But but...

I've just gotten back into riding my '02 beak on a regular basis, commuting 50+ miles per day, and when I'm walking up to the bike after work, I'm still struck by how damn beautiful the thing is. It really is a modern classic, still getting lots of comments/attention. Still looks new. I'm honestly looking forward to growing old(er) with this bike. Bonus: it's reliable, paid for, ample power, and oh so comfortable.

I wanted a bmw primarily because I loved seeing older beemers, and I picked this bike over several other contenders because I'll still think this machine is beautiful decades from now. Lucky for me that the bike I wanted the most just happened to be the cheapest boxer in the showroom.

Go ahead, try out the fast party girl. I'll stick with my sensible, responsible, gorgeous gal even if she can't get her legs behind her head whilst doing a kegstand.

:)

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:13 pm
by sjbmw
yeah, what he said!
When I bought my R for $9990 K bikes were $15k and up.
John makes a point given the price for the new R1200R is now in the K price range.
R's and K are now competing on price.

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:37 pm
by John I. Stephen
sjbmw wrote:Nothing controversial about it.

You are talking about a 130+ hp 4 cylinder, vs. a 85+ hp 2 cylinder.
Well it's 167bhp so I am now informed :D :!: However my point has been missed; bikers keep on about the power and the speed of this bike. I contend that this bike is a wonderful motorcycle in all senses - which just happens to go like a bat out of hell ... only when and IF you decide to open her up.

I just adore almost caressing the throttle and feeling the small whine as she responds almost by thought alone. I could go on, but I won't listen any more to those who tell me that the bike is just too fast. What they really mean is that they find they really cannot contain themselves and yes, in that situation the pussycat will instantly change into a roaring tiger. 'nuff said.... :lol:

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:41 pm
by yjleesvrr
John - that's just it. Knowing you have that power available makes it hard not to resist the temptation to open 'er up! Sure I could doddle around like some old codger in a Chrysler, but knowing that in seconds I could be exceeding the posted speed limit makes the exercise of the option too difficult to deny.

BTW, my understanding is that the 167 claimed hp is at the crank, not the wheel. From what I read, the actual power at the rear wheel is more around 142 hp. That's still a LOT of power for a motorcycle!

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:03 pm
by sjbmw
Plus the lean forward racing position makes keeping one's license even harder. It's a racer for sure.
Anyone done 500 miles on one?
How are the back and elbows?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:33 pm
by Buckster
I am with SJBMW. Much different riding position! I chose the R Because of the riding position. I get the whole twist it and get it. But there are alot of nice four cylinder bikes out there for alot less $$ that can do the same thing!

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:02 pm
by wncbmw
Having all that horsepower available and saying you will not use it is like trying to stay faithful to your wife but taking a detour home every night through the local 'house of ill repute' with $200 cash in your pocket! Can be done but you are a better man than me if you can resist! :lol:

Me, I don't choice to torture myself. I can get in plenty of trouble with the bike (and wife :wink:) I have!

Re: Is this treachery ......?

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:06 pm
by duke
John I. Stephen wrote:... So, is this treachery ...
It IS ... and you know what they call "The Traitor's Gate" ... :D

I had K1200R for 1 day last year when I had the Rockster serviced at 600 miles.
Scared the living daylight out of me on that very cold (near freezing) and wet day.
Before the Rockster I had 125 cc single, so 11 Bhp -> 87 Bhp -> 167 Bhp jump was way too sudden and scary.

Thinking - if I am given today a K1200S ... I might be swayed by the dark side ... as the Rockster is hard work on the motorway.
Not to mention that with the K1200S wiping out every race-rep riding lost soul out of the traffic lights would be touch easier than with Rockster.

But for the time being I will stick to a trusted flat twin.

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:39 pm
by BoiseBeemer
John I. Stephen wrote:However my point has been missed;
John, I'm afraid the missed point is yours. Nobody is saying the bike's extravagant capabilities are too much to handle; they're just saying they're too much to resist. At some point the evil part of your brain is going to force your throttle hand to acknowledge that buying a 200 mph bike with race-crouch ergonomics to trundle around at the speed limit is just plain WRONG. And that's the point at which someone with striped pants is going to confiscate your driving license as collateral for your court appearance. :)

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 11:39 am
by chris
BoiseBeemer wrote: Nobody is saying the bike's extravagant capabilities are too much to handle; they're just saying they're too much to resist. At some point the evil part of your brain is going to force your throttle hand to acknowledge that buying a 200 mph bike with race-crouch ergonomics to trundle around at the speed limit is just plain WRONG. And that's the point at which someone with striped pants is going to confiscate your driving license as collateral for your court appearance. :)
Exactly!! I can't even behave on my R... :wink:
I used to be an out and out hooligan on my GSXR and occasionally the inner idiot still surfaces :twisted: I have to stay away from 167 (142) bhp motorbikes.
For the record on the comfort thing, I could ride much further without getting 'monkey butt' on my GSXR or CBR than I can on the 1150...damn that seat... :?

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:35 pm
by John I. Stephen
OK thanks to all. I think I get the idea. Buying a K1200 is only for the insane....

Still pondering though ....