A serious question about synthetic oils
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:45 am
First up. I am not interested in a flame war.
My question is why do we not use synthetic oil in out bikes? Something like 0w40 fully synthetic Mobil 1 (Yes I gave a brand name.)
Answers from my mechanic and others.
It's too good for them.
I want to use the very best oil I can to minimise engine damage related to poor lubrication.
It will burn oil.
I don't care, 50ml of oil here and there is cheap insurance if it protects my engine better in the long run. And that's about all it has been so far.
They are too thin.
The aim of standard viscosity is to ensure...standard viscosity. At 100 degrees any 40w oil, mineral or synthetic, has a viscosity of approximately 16 centiStokes. Further when it is cold a 10 weight oil has a viscosity that is so high that it provides very poor lubrication at start up. It would seem incredibly advantageous to engine life to use something like 0w40 that almost usable as soon as the engine is cranking over and not 90 seconds later
It will make your seals leak.
I have been using 10w40 synthetic as an experiment since my last oil change and it has never any more than mineral oil. I have always had a tiny bit of seep but never enough to put a drop on the carpet under my bike. My bike has 85,000km on the clock so its no spring chicken. My own experience (and it is only mine) says the leaky seals thing is BS.
BMW don't recommend it.
11 years ago these kinds of oil weren't available. The company is not going to recommend something that didn't exist. My bike is also long out of warranty.
The viscosity modifiers could ruin the clutch.
Dry plate? Please grab me by the throat if I am missing something on this one.
So far my experience has only been positive with the 10w40. The initial startup chatter, fairly mild anyhow, goes very quickly now. So I am wondering.. in a climate that gets down to -9 degrees Celcius why not use something like 0w40 fully synthetic. It's much lower viscosity at cold temperatures means that it is protecting my engine far more quickly than something than a 10w40 oil.
I'm not tying to be a smart$ss. This is a serious question. I have read everything I could lay my hands on at the "bob is the oil guy" site and there doesn't seem to be any reliable reasons, and worse still I have heard some utter rubbish. One person told me that synthetic oil has additives that make it thicker when it gets hot.
I am trying to work out if we don't do use them for a good reason, or it is just a series of "justifications" My mechanic charges me the same rate for 3 litres of mineral oil as I pay for 5 litres of fully synthetic, and i would prefer to use the very best product I can if it is safe and reliable.
So...
What's the story guys?
And to re-iterate. I am not trying to stir the pot. I'm looking for a solid science/engineering based answer that has a bit of proof/reliable testing behind it.
Sol
My question is why do we not use synthetic oil in out bikes? Something like 0w40 fully synthetic Mobil 1 (Yes I gave a brand name.)
Answers from my mechanic and others.
It's too good for them.
I want to use the very best oil I can to minimise engine damage related to poor lubrication.
It will burn oil.
I don't care, 50ml of oil here and there is cheap insurance if it protects my engine better in the long run. And that's about all it has been so far.
They are too thin.
The aim of standard viscosity is to ensure...standard viscosity. At 100 degrees any 40w oil, mineral or synthetic, has a viscosity of approximately 16 centiStokes. Further when it is cold a 10 weight oil has a viscosity that is so high that it provides very poor lubrication at start up. It would seem incredibly advantageous to engine life to use something like 0w40 that almost usable as soon as the engine is cranking over and not 90 seconds later
It will make your seals leak.
I have been using 10w40 synthetic as an experiment since my last oil change and it has never any more than mineral oil. I have always had a tiny bit of seep but never enough to put a drop on the carpet under my bike. My bike has 85,000km on the clock so its no spring chicken. My own experience (and it is only mine) says the leaky seals thing is BS.
BMW don't recommend it.
11 years ago these kinds of oil weren't available. The company is not going to recommend something that didn't exist. My bike is also long out of warranty.
The viscosity modifiers could ruin the clutch.
Dry plate? Please grab me by the throat if I am missing something on this one.
So far my experience has only been positive with the 10w40. The initial startup chatter, fairly mild anyhow, goes very quickly now. So I am wondering.. in a climate that gets down to -9 degrees Celcius why not use something like 0w40 fully synthetic. It's much lower viscosity at cold temperatures means that it is protecting my engine far more quickly than something than a 10w40 oil.
I'm not tying to be a smart$ss. This is a serious question. I have read everything I could lay my hands on at the "bob is the oil guy" site and there doesn't seem to be any reliable reasons, and worse still I have heard some utter rubbish. One person told me that synthetic oil has additives that make it thicker when it gets hot.
I am trying to work out if we don't do use them for a good reason, or it is just a series of "justifications" My mechanic charges me the same rate for 3 litres of mineral oil as I pay for 5 litres of fully synthetic, and i would prefer to use the very best product I can if it is safe and reliable.
So...
What's the story guys?
And to re-iterate. I am not trying to stir the pot. I'm looking for a solid science/engineering based answer that has a bit of proof/reliable testing behind it.
Sol