There's a lot of talk about the benefit of replacing the filter.
In any case, I'll agree with you that just the filter will not do much for performance, however making
access to cold air easier does improve engine performance. This would require more than just the filter.
Many will argue that oil filters are not as good filtering out smaller particles, and that they
require more servicing more ofter, and I'll agree on both arguments...
However paper filters also change their characteristics and ability to filter on very humid and hot
climates, and smaller particles may very well be burned and ejected along with the exhaust...
Both filtering methods have their downside, what is best ? I don't know, there are many variables to
what is best ! What is best to a rider in Riyadh where it is very dry and dusty and a rider in Bangkok
where is incredibly humid ???
Anyway, this is my first K&N, I also had the intakes of my R replaced and I personally did see an increase
of performance, will I stick to K&N or go back to paper filters ? I don't know, I'll make the decision after
the first filter service...
D.
tkm wrote:I ran a K&N for a couple of years on an 04 1150 R. I never noticed any performance gains but mileage suffered and the bike tended to run hot in warm weather. I have since switched back to the stock air filter and the bike is its old pleasant self again. Just one man's experiences yours may be different.................tkm