2014 R1200R wethead ?

Topics related to the ownership, maintenance, equipping, operation, and riding of the R1200R.

Moderator: Moderators

AttackPug
Basic User
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:34 am
Donating Member #: 0

2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by AttackPug »

Will it be possible to keep the front wheel on the pavement with this motor ? It will be a crotch rocket !
Anyname
Basic User
Posts: 103
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 10:32 am

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by Anyname »

Hmmm, it's only a 5hp bump (115 HP vs 110HP) on the GS, and testers report less low end grunt, so it's not going to be a big difference with the present motor. The water cooling should let BMW tweak it a bunch when they want to.

BTW, if I were so imprudent as to feed my cam head a fist full of throttle with the traction control shut off, it would readily wheelie a lot more that I need...

Back when I had my 2005 GS, I was passing through a toll booth with my EZPass gizzie in my left pocket. The toll booth didn't read the EZPass so I reached into my pocket to pull it out and wave it at the antenna. I was idling through the tolls in second at this point. As I pulled away and was up to 3,000 RPM, I realized that the car behind me was closing at a rather higher rate of speed. With my left hand still in my pocket I calculated that I either needed to accelerate a lot faster or get an Audi enema. I chose acceleration and found myself at 40+ MPH with about a foot and a half of air under my front tire and my left hand still struggling to get out of my pocket. All turned out well and I motored off with the nonchalant air of "Yeah, I intended to do that..." Which I didn't.
User avatar
ka5ysy
Triple Lifer
Posts: 1070
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:05 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Prairieville Louisiana

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by ka5ysy »

I rode the GSW at my dealership for about 200 miles in all kinds of traffic. Whoever said that the new wethead has no low end grunt was not riding a wethead. The engine has a lot of available torque in all gears. Cruising at 75 and rolling on the power gives instant acceleration without a downshift. The new engine in a RR version will be something to behold. Only gripe I have with the engine in the GS is that the water radiator on the throttle side blows a lot of heat that you can really feel while stopped. It will be interesting to see how the radiators get handled on the RR version.
MSF #127350 NAUI #36288
2011 RT
WARNING: TEST RIDING THE R1200R IS HAZARDOUS TO YOUR FINANCES
badbs101
Basic User
Posts: 125
Joined: Thu May 03, 2012 10:18 am

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by badbs101 »

Anyname wrote:Hmmm, it's only a 5hp bump (115 HP vs 110HP) on the GS,.
Rated HP is 125 for the wethead (not 115) vs 110 for the camhead. That's 13.6% more hp. I'm sure the new motor is a pretty hefty upgrade but the camhead is no slouch either. I like them both.
Barry - Minnesota

'12 R1200R Classic
'05 F650GS
Acpantera
Lifer
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:26 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Western New York

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by Acpantera »

I rode the the new gsw a couple of weeks ago, I have to say the the engine is as much of an improvement over the hex as the hex was an improvement over the oil head. If BMW decides to build a proper roadster with this engine, I don't think I could resist. Their is no absence of power any where in the rev band, it is smoother, more powerful, more responsive, and shifts slicker than my 07. It will be an entertaining ride for sure.
ASK WHY
User avatar
Lost Rider
Basic User
Posts: 1629
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 1:31 am
Donating Member #: 514
Location: Ventura County, California
Contact:

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by Lost Rider »

Acpantera wrote:I rode the the new gsw a couple of weeks ago, I have to say the the engine is as much of an improvement over the hex as the hex was an improvement over the oil head. If BMW decides to build a proper roadster with this engine, I don't think I could resist. Their is no absence of power any where in the rev band, it is smoother, more powerful, more responsive, and shifts slicker than my 07. It will be an entertaining ride for sure.

That's about how I felt after riding after riding the gsw, and having gone from oilhead to hex head... will be very temping to replace my 07' when they come out as long as BMW doesn't screw it all up.
Get Lost!
Acpantera
Lifer
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:26 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Western New York

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by Acpantera »

The word is that bmw won't make a 2014 k1300r. Perhaps a 135hp boxer roadster with duolever will spark interest.
ASK WHY
User avatar
hjsbmw
Lifer
Posts: 571
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 10:16 am
Donating Member #: 711
Location: RTP, NC

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by hjsbmw »

I have no imminent desire to replace my 07 and hope I don't run into any situations where I would *have* to get a new one. That being said, if there will be a H2O RR and it turns out to be of great appeal, then maybe some years after its introduction where initial bugs and snags hopefully got addressed it may be a different story. My 07 will be around 10 years old then.
Harald
2007 BMW R1200R
User avatar
Woland
Basic User
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 2:23 pm
Donating Member #: 1
Location: Göteborg, Sweden

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by Woland »

hjsbmw wrote:I have no imminent desire to replace my 07 and hope I don't run into any situations where I would *have* to get a new one. That being said, if there will be a H2O RR and it turns out to be of great appeal, then maybe some years after its introduction where initial bugs and snags hopefully got addressed it may be a different story. My 07 will be around 10 years old then.
I'm of the same sentiment, whenever I get a slight urge to change bike it's enough to look at what the alternatives are for me to want to keep my R. The one thing ( apart from maybe getting a Guzzi) that I feel could make me wanna change bikes would be a wethead R with atleast 130hp, not that I need more power, I just want it :)
BoxerSteve
Double Lifer
Posts: 182
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 9:40 pm
Donating Member #: 879
Location: Golden, CO

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by BoxerSteve »

hjsbmw wrote:I have no imminent desire to replace my 07 and hope I don't run into any situations where I would *have* to get a new one. That being said, if there will be a H2O RR and it turns out to be of great appeal, then maybe some years after its introduction where initial bugs and snags hopefully got addressed it may be a different story. My 07 will be around 10 years old then.
Luckily, the "initial bugs and snags" are being worked out on the water cooled GS even as we speak. So when, probably not if, they put the new engine into the R it should be ready for prime time.

I too rode one of the water cooled GS's, it had tons of power. It was pretty dang fun. But I still like my camhead GS. A lot.
User avatar
rad
Basic User
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 1:10 pm
Donating Member #: 1
Location: santa cruz, ca

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by rad »

I have found I have to be careful predicting what bike I will want in the future, it has become such a moving target for me. I like so many bikes, but I've decided to be a one bike at a time guy.

To that end, I like the looks and like the reviews of the new GS wethead, however, I'm currently enjoying being back on a smaller lighter bike, the R. More HP, I don't need or want. I love to corner and hammering the straights between corners no longer holds any mystery for me. Give me a sub 500lb bike and about 100hp and I'm very content.

It will be fun to see how the beta testing shakes out. The current R is a pretty darn reliable platform, other than that silly fuel strip thing. I wonder what the wethead GS weak points will be in regards to reliability?
cug
Basic User
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 2:17 am

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by cug »

rad wrote:I wonder what the wethead GS weak points will be in regards to reliability?
Right now it seems to be switch gear. Horn, signals, starter, heated grips, ... seem to not like rain or washing ... No, I don't have one. I'd like to get a R1200R, current version for the looks. If the waterboxer one looks the same or similar, I'd like it, too.
User avatar
jkhomes
Double Lifer
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:18 pm
Donating Member #: 939
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by jkhomes »

Everything I have read and hear says the motor is a great upgrade, and the wet clutch is smoother and much easier to get to. Supposedly they tested the heck out of the alternator, because the ones inside the case usually got hot and burn out quicker.

I was disappointed to find out they are still calling for dealer service every 6,000 miles. Many brands are going to much longer intervals. It may make a difference in my next purchase...
John K
2008 R1200R
2013 HP4
Acpantera
Lifer
Posts: 360
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:26 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Western New York

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by Acpantera »

ASK WHY
tinytrains
Lifer
Posts: 272
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 10:49 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Torrance CA
Contact:

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by tinytrains »

Interesting that the valves went from 6000 to 12,000 miles, but the plugs went from 24,000 to 12,000. At leaset it only has 2.
Scott Schifer, Torrance CA.
1988 K75 Low Seat
2009 R1200R
AttackPug
Basic User
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:34 am
Donating Member #: 0

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by AttackPug »

What will the weight difference be with a GS and new RR wethead ? Less weight with a RR = harder acceleration. 2014 is going to be interesting with a new GSA , RT/GT, and maybe a RR wets
deilenberger
Honorary Lifer
Posts: 4210
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: New Jersey USA
Contact:

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by deilenberger »

tinytrains wrote:Interesting that the valves went from 6000 to 12,000 miles, but the plugs went from 24,000 to 12,000. At leaset it only has 2.
That seems silly short for plugs.. a decent modern plug with direct ignition (stick coils) should easily last 36,000 miles. Many cars now use 100,000 mile plugs. Moving to a water cooled engine would seem to make this more feasible, not require more frequent changes. I also see they're calling for an air filter at 12,000 miles which seems a very short interval to me unless you're doing a lot of desert riding.

Wonder what plugs they're using and if they reduced the size of the air filter?
Don Eilenberger - NJ Shore
2012 R1200R - I love this bike!
ammolab
Lifer
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:06 pm

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by ammolab »

tinytrains wrote:Interesting that the valves went from 6000 to 12,000 miles, but the plugs went from 24,000 to 12,000. At leaset it only has 2.
Plugs went to 12000 miles with the cam head....all 4 of them!
Red 2011 R1200R
Blue 1986 K75C
Steel Grey 2002 M Coupe
David R
Basic User
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 8:46 pm

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by David R »

AttackPug wrote:Will it be possible to keep the front wheel on the pavement with this motor ? It will be a crotch rocket !
ASC. I have raised the wheel in 3rd once by accident. Scared the chit outa me. The ASC kicked in and set it down gently before I knew what was going on.

I should not have any more power than my camhead. I get too stupid.

Love my camhead, so I am keeping it for a long time. By the time its worn out, I will be looking at the water cooled model.

David
PhilSB
Basic User
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:02 pm
Donating Member #: 0
Location: Doncaster, UK

Re: 2014 R1200R wethead ?

Post by PhilSB »

My dealer offered me a new GS as a loaner whilst in for a service, but with my short fat hairy legs I couldn't cope with the seat height. Damn, I sure would like to have tried it out!
Phil
Post Reply