127 miles on 3.7 gallons = 34.3 MPG
Moderator: Moderators
127 miles on 3.7 gallons = 34.3 MPG
Isn't that pretty bad? Or is this average? I wasn't even pushing the bike much.
I was expecting closer to 45 MPG.
I'm running premium as recommended.
- Anthony
I was expecting closer to 45 MPG.
I'm running premium as recommended.
- Anthony
-
Hogan's Hero
- Basic User
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:42 pm
- Location: NW PA
Depends on way more information that you have given us. What kind of riding? I see a big difference around town v. higher speed roads. Tire pressure checked? When was your last tuneup? Temperature also affects mine more than I expected...both hot and cold.
It does sound a little low, but still in an acceptable range in my opinion.
It does sound a little low, but still in an acceptable range in my opinion.
"Don't call me irrational. It makes me crazy when you do that"
True, it is all around town riding. Temps are around 80 degrees.Hogan's Hero wrote:Depends on way more information that you have given us. What kind of riding? I see a big difference around town v. higher speed roads. Tire pressure checked? When was your last tuneup? Temperature also affects mine more than I expected...both hot and cold.
It does sound a little low, but still in an acceptable range in my opinion.
It had the 6,000 mile service done last year, and now it has 7,200 miles.
- Anthony
-
Hogan's Hero
- Basic User
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 12:42 pm
- Location: NW PA
There's your answer....you aren't riding enough
Seriously, it sounds like you need to take it on the road for a good long ride with another tank of fuel before you worry. 80 degrees, not so long after a tuneup shouldn't make that big of a difference. I think I need to go for a ride to test my own....
Seriously, it sounds like you need to take it on the road for a good long ride with another tank of fuel before you worry. 80 degrees, not so long after a tuneup shouldn't make that big of a difference. I think I need to go for a ride to test my own....
"Don't call me irrational. It makes me crazy when you do that"
A good quick ride outside of town should help, and it does not hurt to run some Seaform or Techron through the tank.
The 2 tanks I had over the weekend were both around 4.1 gal and 183 miles. So that would be around 44 or 45 mpg. Both were at a spirited pace on fun and twisty backroads.
The 2 tanks I had over the weekend were both around 4.1 gal and 183 miles. So that would be around 44 or 45 mpg. Both were at a spirited pace on fun and twisty backroads.
Jeff (lifer #289)
'17 F800GSA
'04 R1150R
There ain't no education in the second kick of a mule!
'17 F800GSA
'04 R1150R
There ain't no education in the second kick of a mule!
- towerworker
- Lifer
- Posts: 2371
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:11 pm
- Location: Staunton Virginia
Don't forget. If you fill up in a hurry and don't let your horse burp properly as you put in that last bit of gas, you won't get near as much down his goozle.
Check your mileage on 3 or 4 tanks full then take an average. Up in Virginia a few weeks ago, Beemeridian and I were running curves all day long and I stayed between 3K and 4K rpms all day. When I filled up I was amazed that I had gotten over 50mpg! Same thing the next day.
Down here in Georgia (lower elevation) I get around 46 or so consistently.
Lot of factors...
Check your mileage on 3 or 4 tanks full then take an average. Up in Virginia a few weeks ago, Beemeridian and I were running curves all day long and I stayed between 3K and 4K rpms all day. When I filled up I was amazed that I had gotten over 50mpg! Same thing the next day.
Down here in Georgia (lower elevation) I get around 46 or so consistently.
Lot of factors...
That's not much worse then I get around town. It runs about 38 mpg usually. The route to the new job is almost all freeway now though, so I'll expect better mileage. (Well, if I can keep the speed down, nightime freeway drivers tend to average 75-80, and I have trouble not staying right with them.) I've tried to quit, but the RR runs really sweet at about 80 in 6th.
I don't get caught in the rain, I ride in it on purpose.
Mine has been as high as 54 mpg the week I bought it to as low as 40 mpg running very hard (for me) in the Blue Ridge foothills. Lately, just going on local errands I seem to be averaging 47 mpg.
I have under 7,000 mi on mine so it's still breaking in. It seems to be getting better MPG and more power as the miles accumulate. Or, perhaps I'm becoming smoother and more confidant.
I have under 7,000 mi on mine so it's still breaking in. It seems to be getting better MPG and more power as the miles accumulate. Or, perhaps I'm becoming smoother and more confidant.
I've been getting about 35 mpg around town, 45 highway. With my Aeroflow w/s I was getting 47 hwy (its off now, for summer).
My impression is the around-town milage suffers b/c of the short trips, time spent parked, idling, and stop-and-go driving.
Picked up my RR with 9600 miles on it; no idea of prior maintenance, no records. Haven't done anything, but change the oil/filter, top up the FD, and check everything else.
Coming up on my 12K tuneup w/in 3 more tanks. One of those tanks will be with Seafoam, the rest will include new sparks, valve adjust and TB synch (if I can figure those last two out). I'd like to be averaging regularly in the 40s and above, as others have posted. Fingers crossed.
My impression is the around-town milage suffers b/c of the short trips, time spent parked, idling, and stop-and-go driving.
Picked up my RR with 9600 miles on it; no idea of prior maintenance, no records. Haven't done anything, but change the oil/filter, top up the FD, and check everything else.
Coming up on my 12K tuneup w/in 3 more tanks. One of those tanks will be with Seafoam, the rest will include new sparks, valve adjust and TB synch (if I can figure those last two out). I'd like to be averaging regularly in the 40s and above, as others have posted. Fingers crossed.
-duckdave
'04 R1150R Silver
Little Rock 'n Roll
Double Lifer #580
'04 R1150R Silver
Little Rock 'n Roll
Double Lifer #580
-
fallingpines
- Basic User
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 12:45 pm
One thing to consider is what is your top gear ratio? My 04' R has the short 6th gear and I have to assume that it must get slightly less MPG cruising on the highway than R's with the tall 6th. I typically see 45 MPG in mixed freeway / city riding.
'04 1150R
'87 FJ1200
'83 vt500 ascot
'82 Seca 650
'75 CB400F
'66 CB77
'61 R60/2
'87 FJ1200
'83 vt500 ascot
'82 Seca 650
'75 CB400F
'66 CB77
'61 R60/2
How would I check this? Doesn't the Rockster have shorter gears than the Roadster?fallingpines wrote:One thing to consider is what is your top gear ratio? My 04' R has the short 6th gear and I have to assume that it must get slightly less MPG cruising on the highway than R's with the tall 6th. I typically see 45 MPG in mixed freeway / city riding.
Your mileage isn't out of line with what I get on my Roadster around town. On the highway though, things improve dramatically and I regularly get just over 50 mpg (US). I need to caveat this and say that this is recent and only happened when I got to around 20k on the clock. With only 12,500 miles on your bike, you still have a way to go before it's truly broken in.
Don't worry about the mileage, just keep filling it up and riding.
Charlie
Don't worry about the mileage, just keep filling it up and riding.
Charlie
'03 R1150R
Life member 365
Errabundi Saepe, Semper Certi
Life member 365
Errabundi Saepe, Semper Certi
-
Spookymonster
- Basic User
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 1:24 pm
- Location: Northern New Jersey, USA
Out of curiosity, why would MPG improve with age? Less friction on the engine parts as the get more polished?
Unfortunately for me, my flaky fuel light means I can't take my mind off my mileage; when my odometer goes past 120, I can never tell if it's malfunctioning, or I'm just getting great fuel economy....
Unfortunately for me, my flaky fuel light means I can't take my mind off my mileage; when my odometer goes past 120, I can never tell if it's malfunctioning, or I'm just getting great fuel economy....
2000 R1100 R with 3480 miles... 3481... 3482... 5003...
Yes, that's my understanding.Out of curiosity, why would MPG improve with age? Less friction on the engine parts as the get more polished?
I should also point out that synthetic oil, which I didn't start to use until I hit about 15,000 miles, is also a contributor to 50+ mpg I'm now seeing on the highway. On the way home to PA from this year's MOA rally, I actually got to 196 miles on the odometer before the low fuel light came on. It was a good feeling to know that in a pinch, I could stretch things to 240 miles.
BTW Spookymonster, where in North Jersey are you? Neat Tony T / Tony L? I grew up in Sopranoland myself.
Charlie
'03 R1150R
Life member 365
Errabundi Saepe, Semper Certi
Life member 365
Errabundi Saepe, Semper Certi
-
boxermania
- Quadruple Lifer
- Posts: 3644
- Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:37 pm
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA.....aproaching retirement
The most I ever got was 48 mpg on 89 grade, that was when the bike was around 4K miles, without any mods and with me (marketing size) on board.
Once I moded the bike and at the latest iteration I was getting consistenly between 41 to 43 mpg irregardless if I would run it hard or leisurely (which I didn't do too often)
BTW, I always used 89, somtimes I tried 87 and she would ping slightly if I would lug the engine or get on the gas quickly.
Once I moded the bike and at the latest iteration I was getting consistenly between 41 to 43 mpg irregardless if I would run it hard or leisurely (which I didn't do too often)
BTW, I always used 89, somtimes I tried 87 and she would ping slightly if I would lug the engine or get on the gas quickly.
Member #312
06 Suzuki Burgman 650 "state of flux"
79 CBX
06 Suzuki Burgman 650 "state of flux"
79 CBX